We help UK businesses assess Zendesk costs and repeated support administration, then improve, connect or replace a defined support workflow where the case supports it. The scope includes ticket history, routing, permissions, testing and team handover.
We can meet anywhere in the UK by arrangement. A replacement is recommended only if the overall case works for your business.
ZendeskREVIEW THE COST
LicenceManual workHandoffs
KEEPCONNECTREPLACE
LESS GOING OUT ↘ MORE STAYING IN ↗
A better decision starts with the actual bill.
We compare licence spend, duplicated work and the real cost of changing. Released staff time is counted separately from cash saved.
THE DECISION
Keep what earns its place. Change what costs more than it delivers.
01
Keep or reconfigure
Check usage, current settings, unused seats and the features your team genuinely relies on.
02
Connect or simplify
Remove duplicate entry and awkward handovers while keeping a system that still fits.
03
Replace with a plan
Scope a new system only after comparing ongoing costs, transition work, data and operational risk.
Start with the channels, service obligations and history your agents need to resolve an enquiry. Zendesk documents that account exports must be enabled by support at the account owner’s request, and that JSON, CSV and XML exports contain different data. A replacement decision needs a tested export route and usable history, rather than just a new inbox.
WHERE THE COST HIDES
Follow the work, not just the subscription.
01
An enquiry into the right queue
Agents reassign tickets manually because channel, customer and issue information does not reach the right team.
What we check Map the intake channels and routing exceptions. Test ownership, priorities and escalation against real examples before deciding whether a smaller support system can serve them.
02
A complete customer conversation
Support staff switch between tickets and another customer system to understand what has already been agreed.
What we check Check what history must be searchable and which fields can be connected. Define the record links and access controls that prevent agents from asking customers to repeat information.
03
Resolved work into a reliable report
Someone exports queues and reconstructs response or workload reports before managers can act.
What we check Agree the measures, service rules and data coverage. Test the proposed reporting against known cases, keeping exceptional and incomplete records visible.
IMPLEMENTATION & HANDOVER
We handle the move, step by step.
Discovery, data mapping, tests, agreed cutover, training and aftercare belong in the delivery plan. The scope depends on what your team uses today.
Some advanced channels, service rules or data types can make retention the better option. We confirm export coverage and replacement suitability before promising a migration; we do not assume that all ticket data or settings move through one file.
Inventory channels, queues, ticket fields, triggers, macros, service rules, knowledge content and integrations.
02
Confirm the authorised export method and account eligibility; sample the chosen format to check comments, attachments and required history.
03
Map users, organisations, ticket identifiers and access restrictions, with a clear plan for any unsupported data.
04
Test new enquiries, replies, reopened cases and escalations; agree channel switch-over and a fallback before changing routing.
05
Train agents, document ownership and retention, and review the signed renewal and cancellation obligations before closing the old account.
Evidence before the decision.
Supplier documentation helps us find the available export and integration routes. It does not establish that every feature, record or obligation can be moved unchanged.